Portra 160 Vs Portra 400

Portra 160 Vs Portra 400. Portra 160 vs 400 Comparing Kodak's Iconic Film Stocks for Photographers — PICTS Lab Portra 400, with its higher ISO, is more versatile in varying lighting conditions As a bonus, 160 tends to be slightly cheaper than 400 or 800 Portra

Portra 400 made its debut just over 2 decades ago and originally came in two variants: "VC" for vivid color and "NC" for natural color I have a roll of Portra 160 now, in terms of what ISO to rate the film do these 2 films behave similarly? I have read how some love overexposing colour negative films for that look.

Portra 160 Vs 400

The 160 works amazingly well at box speed, and that's. Most shot at box speed with a few overexposed by 1 or 2 stops for education purposes I have a roll of Portra 160 now, in terms of what ISO to rate the film do these 2 films behave similarly? I have read how some love overexposing colour negative films for that look.

Portra 160 Vs 400. Grain: Portra 160 offers a finer grain structure, which results in smoother images with less. While Portra 400 handles overexposure well, the 160 has dramatic color shifts when overexposed

Portra 160 Vs 400. Since 1998, Portra 400 has evolved from "VC" and "NC. Kodak Portra 160, on the other hand, requires more light and is better suited for bright, outdoor scenes